| In
an era in which communities are increasingly threatened economically
by mobile capital, ongoing internal competition among states
and localities for new investment and jobs, and the growth of
sprawl, what policy options are now availableor could become
availableto achieve community stabilization? How can alternative
institutional structures favorable to community stability be
nurtured?
The National
Center has undertaken a multi-year research project to examine
a comprehensive range of actual or proposed policies at the
local, state, federal and international levels that can substantially
contribute to the goal of stabilizing communities in the United
States. The overall thrust is in the direction of a more community-based,
decentralized and less globalized political-economy.
The policies
being examined fall into three broad areas:
- Policies
aimed at altering the rules and overall context of the American
economy in a direction more favorable to community stability;
- Government
policies which directly enhance community stability by targeting
jobs or investment to particular areas; and
- Policies
which enhance and support a wide range of non-governmental,
community-rooted economic institutions.
Examples
of larger-scale economic policies impacting community economic
stability include proposed alternative trade policies; proposed
restrictions on capital mobility across borders (such as the
Tobin tax); and broader proposals to rework the central institutions
of the Bretton Woods postwar system (such as the World Bank
and the International Monetary Fund.)
Government
policies which directly enhance community stability in the
United States include public-owned enterprises (particularly
at the municipal level); state-sponsored venture capital funds;
public pension funds undertaking economically targeted investments;
government assistance to help communities affected adversely
by economic shocks such as increased international competition
or military base closures; and both state and local policies
aimed at giving preference to local providers on government
contracts, loans, and tax abatements.
The broadest
category is federal, state and local policies aimed at strengthening
community-rooted economic institutions, such as employee ownership,
community development corporations, community development
financial institutions and cooperatives.
The aim
of this research is to assemble a comprehensive range of both
actual and proposed policies falling within these broad categories,
as well as a compendium of existing subsidies to corporate
business structures (commonly labeled "corporate welfare")
which could potentially be revamped to favor community-based
economic structures. This assembly of different potential
mechanisms for stabilizing community will suggest that it
is indeed possible to stabilize the economic health of communities
over time but that it will require a systemic effort to exert
the tools and powers available to governments at an array
of levels in support of truly community-rooted structures.
|